Immigration and, still, racial justice for me, I think—but that's partly because I can count on one of my senators to pay attention to environmental issues, and the other is particularly interested in consumer affairs and banking (though not only those things: "nevertheless, she persisted" in talking about racism, not banking).
The latest Ballotpedia newsletter has a great summary of immigration actions in this administration. It also has a table of how various Republicans stood on various aspects of AHCA that should be very useful for constituents who can say "you were right about that" or "glad you wouldn't have voted for it, but your wrong about this."
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2017-03-24 10:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2017-03-25 02:12 pm (UTC)The latest Ballotpedia newsletter has a great summary of immigration actions in this administration. It also has a table of how various Republicans stood on various aspects of AHCA that should be very useful for constituents who can say "you were right about that" or "glad you wouldn't have voted for it, but your wrong about this."